About this deal
The stamps are made with quality and comfort in mind so you get a stamp that is easy on your hand without sacrificing a strong impression. It can be helpful to explain your reasons to the requester so they understand why you’ve not fully complied with their request. Anyone with a mild obsession or even just passing interest in stationery knows the joy of a good pen.
Choose from leading brand names in the business for quality and performance you can count on when it matters most. With the exception of Rexel and GBC Business Machines, the warranty for the first 6 months lies with Monkey Office. The breakthroughs and innovations that we uncover lead to new ways of thinking, new connections, and new industries.In 2016, Edward Snowden was revealed as the target of US spying following a failure to redact his personal details. If you can’t get consent and it’s not reasonable to provide the information without it, then you should see if you can redact the other person’s information. Thus, look for a redaction marker, where you only have to make the redaction once, before you scan it.
If you wish to hide texts or labels, you may use this redaction pen rather than destroying the whole document. This marker is not a redacting marker but with its quality, it can hide labels and text you do not want to see. Our exciting WHSmith range encompasses thousands of styles and pen types so you need never be without one again.Therefore, Rupert is unable to comply with Jacob’s request to delete all the information, and retains details relating to Jacob’s pay.
A request isn’t complex in a data protection sense because you use a data processor or because it involves a large amount of information. If the quality of the ink is poor, it is possible to hold the document up against the light and see the original content. For the same reason, where you receive a subject access request but the person dies before you’ve responded, you won’t need to provide the information.From here, it is ultimately possible to simulate what the original text may have been and produce a series of potential, or likely, matches. What should we do if data we’re looking to provide when responding to a SAR contains someone else’s personal data?
